The Woman Problem
Let's get into some crazy stuff.
The rain pours onto the split wind shield of the 2013 Freightliner. The road glistens as the governor repeatedly malfunctions, causing the speedometer to drop and the rpm to rise from 1600 to 1800 before settling back down. I feather the throttle to maintain grip on I-78 eastbound at 4 am. I am not sure who designed or built this road, but I feel like they got a contract by being the lowest bidder and having zero scruples about the deaths they would cause over the years of its use.
A fellow denizen of Discord is in my ear, keeping me company, having conversations about red pill ideology.
The best part of my job is being able to work through complex subjects while getting paid to drive around all night long.
Tonight’s conversation has ranged from a guy with a PHD in history making a claim that slaves in the ancient world and serfs during the medieval period had better lives than we do, to the nature of women and MGTOWs split between NRX and Nietzschean libertarians.
I pushed back on the history student, arguing that slaves on sugar plantations and in the Deep South had objectively worse lives. I did have to give way and say their retirements of fishing and hanging out all day after they could no longer work the fields were objectively better than the retirements we have of abject loneliness and the ones of the future where we may be forced to live in a pod, be pushed off onto an iceberg, or put into a semi-voluntary euthanasia machine. I am not being hyperbolic; look at Canada and its MAID program, which has been coercing people with the sniffles into offing themselves.
As for the MGTOW split, though, this conversation I could dig my teeth into. I have 3 daughters who bring me more joy than I deserve, and, well, a few women who would get mad if they heard me say I had a few women.
Back in the 2010s, the MGTOW movement came to prominence due to the increasingly worse treatment of men in family courts, child support, false rape allegations, sexual harassment seminars, preferential treatment for women in education, and human resources treating men as a problem to be solved. With the rise of YouTube and independent journalists having time and resources to look into issues that they were interested in, the combined autism of 4chan, Discord, Reddit, and single young men led to content that exposed a reality people were not ready for. With internet sites like Facebook and Twitter being run by corporate interests trying to pull in ad revenue and therefore wanting to have the maximum number of humans possible using the site to maximize revenue, they could not allow for these creators to “creep out” the womenfolk, so they nuked them from orbit with the ban hammer. The movement was restricted to YouTube, 4chan, and Bitchute, where one name took over: Turd Flinging Monkey. I was starting off my YouTube career when he got big and befriended him, and we had many discussions about philosophy and life. We had more in common than you may think. He came from a broken home, as I did, and was immensely poor just as I was. We had a mutual respect because I told him the truth and reigned him in when he went too far out on a ledge. He once said that we should kill looters when the government fails. I said why would you kill hungry people for being hungry. I reminded him that you once ate out of a dumpster yourself as a child. We are all human.
He preached self-actualization and tried to help others around him. The people around him were often toxic losers, angry at the world. He is a good man and always has been. His methods were more of the bootstrap type than anything else. But he believed that men could do this.
After the ban hammer came his way, he went deep underground on his own platform, and I haven’t seen him since.
After this, came the skizm in the community between the NRX and the Libertarian Nietzists.
The NRX people are Italian political school guys, which I started off with. The Libertarians are extreme liberals who believe all people are individuals and the world runs on ideas and principles.
I started in my political journey by reading Sun Tzu, Machiavelli, Bernays, and Kaczynski. I was never going to remain a libertarian for very long with this reading list. My understanding of the world has always been about systems and structures rather than about ideas and principles. This has negatives and positives. This will lead to an understanding of why people do what they do without giving them credit for it. This stands in stark contrast to those who feel as though everyone should be responsible for everything they do.
This puts me in direct opposition to people who want to hold women accountable for their actions. I always find this strange in MGTOW because they have the ideas of hypergamy, economics, and sexual dimorphism completely wrapped up, but still refuse to accept the structural explanations of why women aren’t held accountable as men are. For those not in know women get 30% of the time a man does for the same crime, they get welfare in disproportionate rates, they have the right to vote without having to register for selective service, they get alimoney and child support, there is only 1 abused men shelter in the country, breast cancer gets 500 times the advertising and funding as prostate cancer even though prostate cancer is 10 times more lethal, education caters to women, women are considered a minority even though they are 51% of the population, women outvote men by 20 million votes each election, millenial and gen z women make more than men, the wage gap is a myth based on gross pay without looking at hours worked, paternity fraud may be as high as 20% and has never been prosecuted, men kill themselves at 4 times the rate of women, men in family courts are not entitled to due process, rape accusations in colleges are investigated by a nongovernmental court and men can be expelled and all money forfieted to the college and loans still due with no due process, men are twice as likey to be virgins at 30, women have unreal expectations of young men in the dating scene, women can and have aborted an entire generation (80 million, the millenials are only 76 million) of our nations children and never even had to discuss it with the fathers,ect. ect.
These are but a few of the grievances raised by men in these circles.
These grievances range from the abstract to holy shit that is fucking crazy. The thing is, though, that all of them affect every man in the country and, in particular, hit those who are young and are supposed to be forming families at the moment. How do you go to college and date women who might accuse you of rape (falsely), graduate, get a decent job, save, buy a home, get married, and have kids with a person who can leave at any time, take the kids, demand half of what you own, plus a payment, all while you are not entitled to basic habeas corpus (due process)?
If you are a liberal, you see this as an issue of responsibility. You see this as a problem of fixing the courts or holding women accountable, or you may just blame men and ask why you are being accused, or why she wants to divorce you, or you may think you must have done something wrong for her to divorce you. When the divorce rate is 50% of all marriages, is it really that 50% of men are bad?
Once you try holding women accountable and realize this is like trying to drain a lake with your bare hands, you will probably think we can educate people to be better spouses and put them in counseling. Well, once that fails completely because counseling couples has a 38% success rate, you will realize that this might be a structural issue that can not be addressed on the individual level, and you will look to men like me.
See, I have been saying the washing machine was the most dangerous invention in the history of humanity. The reason for this is the same reason I am a communitarian. I think you need activities that support a positive transactional relationship with those around you. Women and men need each other. Men need women because men need someone to be responsible for, and women need men because women need someone to lean into. But men and women also need communities.
If you were to go buy a dog, a gerbil, or a parrot from a pet store, the people there would give you a list of things that animal needs. They would tell you the dog needs a certain diet, socialization, exercise, and bathing. A gerbil would need food, bedding, a cage, a wheel, water, etc. A parrot needs space, love, attention, and other parrots, and other bird things I don’t know about because I never bought a bird. We humans, though, act like we are above all these things. We are like, “Hey, go eat styrofoam ramen noodles and high fructose corn syrup-laden Doritos and live in isolation, jerking off to furry porn, you will be just fine.” If you were going to buy a human from a pet store, would they recommend this as a human’s lifestyle? Fuck no!
This is what we need: supportive communities with a vested interest in the success of our relationships and a purpose for each other in our lives. It isn’t love or some contract that kept our great-great-great-grandparents together. It was waking up every day and needing each other to survive. Having mutual respect for each other, which only comes from knowing the other person, is why we are going to make it through the winter.
The community’s cohesion is reliant upon not fucking each other’s wives, and protecting what is ours is how you stop things like paternity fraud. These structures are not economically viable in modernity due to the need for the commoditization of labor and the need to travel for work, but is the need to fit into a corporate economic structure more important than the survival of our people and families? I say no, but then again, I am sitting in a climate-controlled room typing into a computer after traveling all night, so who knows. Anyway, I gotta rest, hope you enjoyed. I am outty 5000.


Pretty good, as always. Not crazy. You are, however, locked in that libertarian/communitarian ping-pong game. Sorry to say. Like the man/woman thing, the answer is hierarchy. Women rebel against male authority (see Genesis 2 in your favourite book). Your commoditization theory is a good enough explanation for why this happened, but, ultimately, an absurd notion like "equality of the sexes"---completely at odds with the bulk of Western history and ALL of its important texts--has put us into the mess we are in. Causal reciprocity here. Damn, you must be old if you remember the original "manosphere" days. Good times. Rian Stone has preserved a lot of it in his "sidebar." Get some sleep and carry on.
I remember being a MRA back in the day and my biggest flaw was being fundamentally liberal and expecting women to be the same as men. They're not. They're subject to vastly different evolutionary pressures which have of course acted on the brain as much as the rest of the body.
We don't expect women to become lumberjacks and shiprights because that would be insane. Equally we should not expect women to excercise direct political authority and generally act like men.
Communitarianism is an important answer, but part of that answer has to be men becoming men again and women becoming women.